In the journey of pursuing our goals, we often encounter a choice: whether to work hard to overcome difficulties and continue moving forward firmly, or whether to give up on the goal because of too many difficulties.

This is a very real question. Many people claim to be willing to face challenges, but in practice, they often give up for various reasons. This contradictory phenomenon deserves our in-depth study.

Achieving goals is never easy.

In daily life, whether it is personal academic improvement or the implementation of business projects, you may encounter various challenges.

For example, if the entrepreneurial project is located in an urban area with fierce business competition, although there are many potential customers there, high rents and fierce competition in the same industry will undoubtedly bring real challenges to the entrepreneurs.

In the field of academic research, scientific researchers have encountered problems such as resource shortages and obsolete research facilities.

These difficulties and examples illustrate the ubiquitous fact that obstacles must be faced to achieve goals.

Overcoming goal obstacles is no easy task.

We often lack the appropriate knowledge, skills or support from external resources.

A young man who is new to the workplace aspires to be promoted to project director within one year, but he lacks the necessary management skills, has to deal with fierce peer competition, and lacks effective resources to help him quickly increase his competitiveness. These difficulties make it difficult for him to achieve his goal. The process was extremely difficult.

Many people are firm when it comes to clearing obstacles, but start making excuses when it comes to action.

"Not meeting the conditions" is a common excuse, but it often masks inner laziness or fear.

Some people harbor dreams of learning foreign languages ​​and traveling abroad, but as soon as they start making study plans, they begin to complain about poor learning conditions and lack of guidance from foreign teachers.

Nowadays, the Internet is highly developed and learning resources are abundant. If we want to learn, we can study independently through online courses, or join local activities such as foreign language learning corners.

This reason reveals that many people lack the ability to create conditions independently like truly strong people.

In the fierce market competition, entrepreneurs who are eager to occupy market share can still proactively find a way out even if they face the dilemma of shortage of funds and lack of connections.

Some small businesses initially opened stores in remote places, but they took the initiative to use online platforms to promote their products across the country. In sharp contrast, those who cited poor geographical location as a reason seemed to lack the fighting spirit.

Francis took active action when the education bill was blocked by the Speaker.

This example gives us a profound lesson. When encountering difficulties, we should not complain first, but should actively look for ways to solve the problem.

He deeply analyzed the threats that the Speaker might face and used a series of complicated strategies to try to persuade the Speaker to support the bill. This aggressive attitude is crucial to achieving your goals.

He uses interest exchange strategies in the political field. Although the process is complicated and some methods are not fair enough, from the perspective of achieving the goal, this is an efficient way to remove obstacles.

In the process of business negotiations, sometimes in order to win a key project, one party may sacrifice some non-core interests in exchange for the support of the other party's high-quality resources in order to achieve the success of the project.

In politics and many competitive situations, it is common for people like David to become pawns.

In corporate workplaces, mid-level or junior employees sometimes become pawns or victims of interests in the battles between senior leaders.

During a company's department reform process, some team members lost their say in the adjustment and were randomly assigned to new departments. The work content of these employees has changed dramatically, and they, like David, were innocently involved in complex situations.

The wolf-sheep thinking tells the cruel truth in the competitive environment.

If you don't have the ability to take control of the situation, you may be swallowed up.

In the fierce competition for project bidding, if a small company does not have a strategy, it is like a docile sheep that can only be swallowed up by large companies. Only by being like a wolf, carefully planning and shaping your own unique competitive advantages, can you stand out among many opponents and win the initiative.

The House of Representatives and its distribution of powers in a bicameral system illustrate the complexity of setting and achieving goals in the management of public affairs.

During the bill advancement stage, there are complex interest relationships among different politicians and groups, and they check and balance each other.

In the process of proposing a fiscal budget plan, the respective interests of representatives of various constituencies in the House of Representatives may cause disputes. Behind each member is the different demands of many voters. These factors make it difficult to advance the bill smoothly and quickly.

Political groups in various countries have their own characteristics, but they all face difficulties in achieving their goals.

The political situation in Italy is complicated by competition between political parties. The essence of this struggle is that in the process of exchanging interests and realizing goals, all parties need to overcome their own internal and external obstacles, or choose to compromise and give up.

Faced with goals, we must face challenges head-on whether we want to or not, because circumstances provide many reasons to hold back.

The choice between Francis desperately clearing obstacles or giving up the established goal at the right time is not a simple distinction between right and wrong.

In reality, we have to analyze the situation and weigh our own capabilities and resources to make decisions.

When ordinary workers encounter setbacks in their career development, they may not encounter fierce competition like political struggles, but they still need to think about how to enhance their abilities and overcome the difficulties of career advancement.

If you encountered insurmountable obstacles in the pursuit of an important goal, what choice would you make?