Now, many people are debating the connection between Gothic architecture and scholasticism. Art historians and philosophers may be skeptical of this approach.

It contains many aspects worthy of in-depth study, whether it is to explore the connection between the two or to analyze its development and changes in various periods and its impact.

Gothic architecture has a unique development history.

The monastery established in the early 9th century continued as an academic center for 150 years. However, by the end of the 10th century, it suffered the fate of destruction.

The development of Gothic architecture has its specific era background.

In the field of scholasticism, growth also occurred in the early years. In modern understanding, in 1202 Curzon compiled the Summa Theologiae, a seminal work in the field.

These early circumstances laid some groundwork for a possible connection.

In the early stages, geographical and other conditions will also play a role. For example, in different areas of Paris, the pace of development may be different.

In the field of scholastic philosophy, there were such influential works as the Summa Theologiae compiled by Alexander of Harry. This work has been described as quite heavy.

The philosophical achievements of John the Irishman were as brilliant and unexpected as the Carolingian Renaissance. However, these achievements and the potential of the characters were not recognized in time at that time.

Around 1170, the Notre Dame School began to lead the development of Gothic architecture.

The achievements of different characters in different fields have their own impact. Observing the timeline can reveal that there is a certain synchronic trend in their development.

The achievements they represented also reflected the height of development in the cultural, artistic and ideological circles at that time.

After Saint Louis died in 1270, about fifty or sixty years passed, and the glorious period of scholasticism gradually came to an end.

The high period of Gothic architecture also came to an end roughly during this period.

There is a decentralization trend in fields such as spirituality and art.

Nowadays, Gothic architecture has either been reduced to a kind of dogma or has been pared back and simplified, as seen in the mendicant orders.

Scholastic philosophy is undergoing a change in the way it discusses. This is reflected in the discussion of certain issues, such as metaphysical and theological issues about the existence of God, which in the past could only be discussed from the perspective of possibility.

At this stage, multiple factors such as the social environment and the church worked together to cause the development trends of the two to be consistent after the prosperity period.

The evolution of church styles in various places and the changes in scholars' concepts can reflect this characteristic.

It is unlikely that the people who built Gothic buildings read the original works of thinkers such as Gilbert and Thomas Aquinas.

But they could have been influenced by scholastic views through many other channels.

This mode of influence is subtle and complex.

Some places of learning or religious exchanges may spread scholastic views, which may have an impact on architects' design concepts, but this influence does not come from direct reading of the original works.

Unfortunately, exploring such parallel phenomena in the contemporary literature requires a different approach and specialized research. At present, only Maury has covered it in his book "Medieval Art", but the space is limited.

This attempt to link Gothic architecture with scholasticism is rightly met with skepticism.

From the perspective of art historians, they usually question the legitimacy of this connection. When analyzing, they will pay attention to changes in architectural art styles, artistic expression techniques, etc.

Philosophers will start from the philosophical theoretical system and focus on more abstract levels such as ideological logic to explore the rationality and scientific basis for the connection between the two.

The perspective of historical research and the rigorous requirements of the modern academic system require that this connection be supported by solid evidence and supported by reasonable arguments.

Artists and philosophers from different regions may have significant differences in their understanding of art and philosophy. Some places pay more attention to the concrete expression of art, while other places pay more attention to its ideological depth.

Although attempts to link the two have been questioned, this research is meaningful.

From the perspective of cultural inheritance, this helps to understand the cultural ecology of the entire society at that time.

In the field of historical research, we can more comprehensively present the social conditions and public opinion of that era as well as the ideological status of the people.

Contemporary architectural and philosophical research may bring a new research perspective.

In-depth research can bring some enlightenment to the current progress of architectural design and philosophical concepts.

By studying the role of scholastic philosophy on Gothic architecture at that time, we can inspire modern architecture to achieve more innovations in the combination of function and concept. Understanding this influence will help modern architecture seek new breakthroughs in integrating functions and concepts.

Do you think this approach to studying the connection between Gothic architecture and scholasticism will gain more general approval in the future?