In the fields of politics and sociology, organization-related theories have always been a hot research topic.

Comparing the views of different thinkers can better grasp the significance and uniqueness of a particular organizational thought. In this field, there are many values ​​and controversies worthy of in-depth study.

In the Russian social environment at that time, there were many intertwined forces.

Both the revolutionary populists and the Second International had different forms of political organization and ideas.

During the period from the end of the 19th century to the beginning of the 20th century, Russia encountered numerous social changes.

In this particular place and moment, Lenin gained a profound insight into the differences in the organization of professional revolutionaries. Through comparison, he realized the importance of this organization.

At that time, Russian society was full of contradictions, and the people were eager to change the status quo.

The old organizational structure encountered many difficulties during the change. For example, the leadership was not strong enough in promoting change.

This made Lenin realize the necessity of establishing a new organization of professional revolutionaries.

Different political ideas have different soils for their growth.

The Russian society that Lenin faced was very different from that of Western countries at that time.

The class contradictions in Russian society have become more acute, and the remnants of feudalism have become more serious.

This required a more cohesive and efficient combination to promote revolution, so the organization of professional revolutionaries came into being.

Lenin and Weber held their own unique political concepts and analytical methods at the ideological level. There are significant differences between Lenin's political philosophy and Weber's analytical methods.

Lenin paid attention to the specific conditions in Russia, and the focus of his thinking was to explore how to find effective organizational forces for the Russian revolution.

Weber's analysis of professional politicians is more based on the Western social background.

Weber's analysis is influenced by some traditional values ​​of Western society.

The time may be more based on the relatively stable development environment in the West at that time.

According to Lenin, Russia needed a different organizational concept.

For example, in the actual situation in Russia, mass mobilization relies on tight organization.

The system that Weber mentioned in his analysis that professional politicians rely on is mainly closely related to Western electoral culture.

Geographically, the situation of workers in Russia's rural areas and cities is different from that in Western countries.

Lenin's thoughts on the conspiratorial and centralized nature of party organizations have their own unique origins.

From the side, compare it with the revolutionary populists and the Second International.

At that time, facing the suppression of the Russian rulers, the revolutionary situation in Russia became extremely serious. In this context, in order to ensure that the organization is not destroyed, it must adopt a conspiracy approach.

During a certain period of time, many revolutionary patriots were hunted down and assassinated, which made the organization's confidentiality become crucial to its survival and growth.

In Russia, because farmers and workers were widely distributed, gathering became a key way to strengthen the strength of unity.

Unlike the looser groups of the Russian revolutionary populists, Lenin's ideas were more inclined to concentrate his efforts and explore how to stimulate the greatest revolutionary vitality through tight organization.

Compared with the Second International, Lenin discovered its problems in organizational coordination and other aspects, so he strengthened his emphasis on the concept of centralization and unity.

During the period when the Chinese Communist Party was working in the White Areas, its activities were mainly concentrated in major cities in our country and areas controlled by the Kuomintang.

We can see the influence of Lenin's thought.

The CCP's work in the white areas encountered great risks and challenges, which were quite similar to the difficulties encountered by the organization during Lenin's time.

There must be a core group to lead.

At that time, the staff in the White Area made careful arrangements, and the way they organized their tasks was similar to the organizational concept advocated by Lenin.

Information exchange and activity arrangements must be kept confidential and must be closely controlled by superior leaders.

Special arrangements are made for personnel allocation to ensure efficient work.

Thinkers such as Lenin and Peter had resonance in their common pursuit of social change.

In the area of ​​key leadership competencies, they observed that certain social classes demonstrated unique contributions within the group.

Although Lenin's thoughts have a Russian local flavor in many geographical and political environments, they can still resonate with other thoughts.

From a time perspective, this resonance also has historical continuity.

During the course of history, revolutionaries and social reformers of all kinds learned from each other and adopted excellent organizational concepts.

Lenin’s ideas have unique significance and influence in this chain of ideological inheritance.

In Chinese sociological research, there has always been the research direction of units and organizations.

In the past, it was more of a technical analysis, such as how to improve organizational efficiency.

It is of great significance now to trace the analysis back to its political roots.

Within China, society is progressing rapidly, but at the same time it is also encountering many social conflicts that need to be reconciled.

Studying Lenin’s thoughts is helpful to look at the development direction of units and organizations from the root.

It is necessary to deeply understand Lenin's organizational philosophy, explore how it was formed in the social context, and how it had practical impact.

We can make more valuable judgments about the organizational development of Chinese society.

There are new ways of thinking about member relationships and leadership models within the unit organization.

Organizational construction based on China's national conditions can draw on the essence of Lenin's thought.

Today, everyone has a consensus on Lenin's party philosophy and its far-reaching influence. So, how do you think Lenin’s organizational concepts are combined with modern enterprise management ideas in today’s society?