Peace 2 Military Operation: The whole nation is participating in beheading Xi Jinping and driving out the Chinese Communist Party

All of us Chinese cannot wait any longer. Every day of delay will bring great suffering, disaster, revenge, social suici···

Current location:Home>>News Headlines>>Thought Literature

Crossing The Urban-Rural Divide: Urban-Rural Connectivity And Governance Challenges From Imperial China To The Republic Of China

Release time:2025-01-21

During the liberation war and the implementation of land reform policies in the early days of the founding of New China, as well as in many subsequent movements, the role of the work team was crucial.

This governance model originated from the Soviet Union, and Mao Zedong and his comrades made significant contributions to it.

This is a topic worthy of in-depth discussion, and there are many points that have not been fully explored.

The role of work teams under land reform policy

The implementation of the land reform policy during the Chinese Liberation War and the early days of the founding of New China was a major event.

At that time, the working team went to various places to promote and implement the land reform policy.

In North China, team members traveled through the streets and spread knowledge about land reform to farmers.

In some villages, team members personally measured the land and then distributed it to farmers with little or no land.

This measure adjusted the rural economic structure, allowing many farmers to own land as a basic production resource, greatly increasing their enthusiasm for production, and at the same time strengthening their support for the new China's regime.

This is not only an important exploration result of the CCP in the field of rural governance, but also makes the distribution of rural resources more reasonable and fair.

Team mode in multi-sport

The work team played a key role in many subsequent movements.

As in the cooperative movement, etc., work teams play the role of guide.

When cooperatives are established in specific areas, they actively call on the public to join in and jointly promote the integration and rational distribution of resources.

For example, the deployment of labor force, the raising of initial funds, etc.

Moreover, technology will be widely disseminated, boosting agricultural output and income. In this process, the task force played a vital role and was the core part of the effective implementation of the policy at the grassroots level, ensuring that the movement moved forward along the established goals.

Exploring the origins of China’s work team model

The task force model has its own deep historical roots.

Wang Qisheng, a historian, pointed out that this phenomenon began during the Northern Expedition and was a special faction cultivated by the peasant movement lectures.

In the mid-1920s, although the CCP operated in the form of individual correspondents, it also began to carry out revolutionary propaganda and mobilization among farmers through small groups.

At that time, the special commissioners mainly went into rural areas to carry out ideological enlightenment and political education activities. They aimed to mobilize peasants to support the revolution. Although the scale and form are relatively simple, the outline of the task force has initially emerged, which can be regarded as an early attempt.

The development of the work team model and its performance during the Anti-Japanese War

History evolved to the establishment stage of the Red Army, and the work teams at that time had already begun to make more careful arrangements.

By the time of the Anti-Japanese War, the work team had undergone new developments and changes.

In 1939, the Party Central Committee decided to include members and non-members of women's groups into the ranks of wartime work teams in order to broadly attract the masses to participate in the anti-Japanese and nation-building undertakings.

In the spring of 1945, the central government required the armed work team to transform into a "political work team."

During this period, young intellectuals, especially female intellectuals, began to be introduced into the rural work force.

During this period, the work teams during the Anti-Japanese War took on a special form and became the core channel for communication and management between urban and rural areas. This form was still inherited and improved after 1949.

Comparison with the Soviet-Russian Task Force Differences between Countries

The origin and composition of Soviet Russia's grain requisition detachments were obviously urban, and they were mainly composed of industrial workers.

When they went to the countryside to collect grain, they encountered hostility from farmers, causing the grain collection mission to fail.

Although the grain collection team in the early days of the People's Republic of China referenced the Soviet Union's grain collection model to some extent, there were differences in member composition, execution discipline, and actual results.

When China's work teams perform their tasks, they have a more harmonious relationship with the people and do their work more thoughtfully. They went deep into each household to understand the situation of grain reserves, instead of resorting to forced grain requisition.

This makes the implementation of China's rural policies smoother.

Advantages of work teams under CCP governance

Compared with the Soviet Union, the Chinese Communist Party has demonstrated excellent training and control capabilities for work teams.

In China, this method of work governance can be effectively used for a long time.

In the early 1950s, the Soviet Union became more cautious in sending commissioners to collective farms. At the same time, China’s work teams continue to demonstrate their significant demonstration and guidance role in many economic and political activities. This phenomenon highlights the uniqueness and innovation of the CCP's governance method. It also shows that this model is consistent with China's national conditions at the time, allowing many policies to be successfully implemented at the grassroots level.

When studying the development of the task force at that specific historical stage and its differences with the Soviet Union, we also need to consider the issue: Can we draw something from the historical task force model in terms of current rural governance or policy implementation? Idea or experience?

Readers, please share your views in the comment section. At the same time, we also look forward to your support of liking and forwarding this article.


中文版

español

Copyright © 2023 Peaceful Earth en.yjhpg.com XML Map