Foreign media mentioned the views of Professor Yin Hong of Renmin University of China, pointing out that in order to ensure Trump's re-election, the United States may challenge my country's bottom line in its China policy, especially on issues involving Taiwan.

This topic quickly brought to light an important controversial point in international politics, namely how the United States handles the Taiwan issue, which conflicts with China's core interests.

Azar from the United States visited Taiwan. The New York Times analyzed that the timing and nature of the visit may reflect the government's attempt to divert public attention away from the ineffective prevention and control of the virus.

And the United States believes that there is a precedent and hopes that mainland China will not "overreact."

The United States has promulgated relevant laws to promote all-round exchanges between US and Taiwan officials. This move reflects the frequent provocative actions taken by the United States on the Taiwan Strait issue.

Domestic political factors in the United States have contributed to the situation. Trump tried to divert domestic attention and pursue personal political interests. This kind of behavior completely disregards China's feelings and unilaterally manipulates relations between major powers, which is really outrageous.

The United States has repeatedly tested the boundaries on the Taiwan Strait issue. This is not the first time this phenomenon has occurred. This behavior has seriously damaged the stable foundation of Sino-US relations.

Scholars from mainland China and the United States have different views on the situation in Taiwan.

Chinese scholars are wary of Tsai Ing-wen's gradually advancing "Taiwan independence" activities, while American scholars feel that Tsai Ing-wen has been more cautious and restrained, while also restraining those forces that advocate rapid independence.

The essence of "Taiwan separatism" under Tsai Ing-wen's administration will not change based on the views of American scholars. At the same time, she also invested a lot of energy in collusion between the United States and Taiwan.

Behind the split of Taiwan is the strategic deployment of the United States in dealing with the Taiwan issue. This layout cannot conceal the damage caused by the breakdown of relations between the United States and Taiwan to the stability of the Taiwan Strait region. The views of American scholars cannot change this fact.

American scholars believe that the risk of conflict in the Taiwan Strait is greater than that of the South China Sea. However, their general domestic tendencies have not stopped the United States from taking risky and provocative actions on the Taiwan issue.

Public opinion in mainland China’s self-media generally condemns such actions by the United States.

Many articles pointed out that the United States seems to have hit the bottom line, calling on the government to clarify its position or take the opportunity to deal with the Taiwan issue.

The self-media reflects the people’s firm attitude that national sovereignty should not be violated on the Taiwan issue.

Netizens continue to pay attention to developments across the Taiwan Strait and hope that our country will take a tough stance and resolutely defend its national sovereignty and territorial integrity when encountering provocation from the United States.

It is also important to note that the words in self-media may be emotionally charged, which actually shows the public's great concern for the Taiwan issue.

But this cannot conceal the political manipulation behind his visit to Taiwan.

This move by the U.S. government is intended to achieve two purposes at the same time. On the one hand, it tests my country's bottom line on the Taiwan Strait issue; on the other hand, it provides so-called "aid" to Taiwan under the pretext of epidemic prevention in order to continue to constrain Taiwan and strengthen cross-strait relations. Lay hidden dangers. This kind of duplicity is really unacceptable.

The U.S.'s moves on the Taiwan issue are likely due to the upcoming domestic election and the need to distract public attention from the inadequate response to the epidemic.

Looking at the United States, the epidemic is spreading and the government is mishandling it. The Trump administration urgently needs to distract the public's attention.

Hyping up the China issue on the Taiwan issue is a useless card in their hands.

In order to achieve their own political goals, they do not hesitate to sacrifice Sino-US relations and the stability of the Taiwan Strait.

The United States has also taken this into consideration when formulating its global strategy. They intend to limit China's growth, and Taiwan Island has become a key chess piece in their hands.

In response to the US provocation on the Taiwan issue, China should adopt "non-reciprocal" countermeasures.

If the United States or Taiwan touches the bottom line of the Anti-Secession Law, our country must be ready to seize the opportunity and properly handle the Taiwan issue at any time.

Compared with the Crimea issue, China has more advantages in resolving the Taiwan issue.

China must demonstrate to the United States and Taiwan that its military options are always a viable option, in compliance with international and domestic law, while clearly defining the bottom line that cannot be crossed.

When other countries provoke provocations on the South China Sea issue, the Taiwan issue can be a good counterattack point.

Not only in the diplomatic field, but also in military and economic aspects, strategic arrangements need to be formulated to deal with the US's reckless behavior on the Taiwan issue.

So, what additional response strategies do you think our country can implement in response to possible future provocations from the United States?