With President Biden recently taking office, there appear to be renewed signs of color revolutions around the world. Russia is encountering some difficult problems, and the Navalny incident is particularly eye-catching. Behind this incident, there are many political struggles and social effects that deserve in-depth study.

In Russia's privatization process, the 500-day shock plan is particularly well-known, and Yavlinsky, the leading expert on the plan, has also attracted much attention.

Since Russia chose the liberalization model, the gap between rich and poor has widened rapidly.

Once this gap between rich and poor is formed, it will be difficult to readjust and improve it.

A large number of resources are concentrated in the hands of a few people, which has seriously affected the lives of ordinary people and intensified conflicts between various classes. These have laid hidden dangers for the future instability of society.

In some places, the dissatisfaction of ordinary people is gradually increasing, and some people are trying to use this emotion to pursue personal political interests.

Navalny is relatively young and good-looking, and his way of attracting people is quite special.

Rather than resorting to traditional large-scale reporting when exposing corruption, he decided to make short films.

This method is more easily accepted by young people, especially Russian teenagers.

His novel exposure method has indeed attracted the attention of many young people. However, whether there is any interference from other forces hidden behind this really requires further exploration.

He disseminated corruption information through simple and clear videos. Many young people and the public may have been affected before they fully grasped the full picture of the incident, because young people may not have a comprehensive and in-depth understanding of social issues.

Putin showed contempt when faced with questions from German reporters about the Navalny incident. When a German media reporter asked about the Navalny incident, Putin responded with contempt. Putin's attitude seemed quite contemptuous when asked by German media reporters about the Navalny incident.

He raised questions. Firstly, he wondered why someone would do this. Secondly, he emphasized that if the Russian intelligence agency had acted, it would never have led to the current situation.

Putin has been in power in Russia for a long time and has a deep understanding of the domestic and foreign political pressures Russia is under. He does not want to see Russia sink into unnecessary internal strife. Putin has demonstrated a firm political stance against external forces trying to destabilize Russian society through Navalny and others. This stance also demonstrates Russia's determination not to give in easily to external forces on similar incidents.

After Biden took office as President of the United States, the U.S. embassy and consulates in Russia have become more active in handling certain matters.

The release of the route map seems to be a safety warning, but it is actually guiding and controlling the direction of the march.

This approach caused great anger among the Russian people.

This shows that the United States intends to create unrest in Russia. Behind this must be its strategic consideration in the international political landscape. The United States attempts to use this method to undermine Russia's domestic stability and thereby affect Russia's status on the international stage. This obvious external interference in the internal affairs of another country clearly violates the basic norms of international relations.

Social media played an important role in this incident.

Navalny’s vigorous activities on social media and his targeting of Russia’s younger generation undoubtedly made Putin extremely dissatisfied.

Through information technology, contemporary youth have a preliminary understanding of social problems, but this understanding may not be comprehensive and objective.

Social media has shown obvious political tendencies. For example, in the United States, politicians encouraged people to take to the streets, which is similar to the role played by social media in the Navalny incident in Russia. These platforms tend to serve certain countries or regimes and have been transformed into political tools.

The impact is that many people may behave irrationally under guided public opinion.

When looking at related events in Russia, we can make a comparative analysis from similar events that occurred in multiple locations.

We can compare the relevant pictures from Russia with those from Hong Kong, and at the same time, compare them with scenes in European and American countries.

As time goes by, people will notice that the photos and images of demonstrations taking place in various places become more and more similar, but there are also some differences. For example, the American police's methods of suppression appear more professional than those in other places.

This shows that in countries like the United States, there is a double standard in the political system. There is a huge difference in how they handle similar incidents in their own country and similar incidents in other countries.

The current international situation is complex and ever-changing. The situations that Russia has encountered not only have a major impact on Russia domestically, but also have a profound effect on the global political landscape.

What do you think of Russia’s effective strategy to deal with foreign forces provoking color revolutions at home?