On the international political stage, the attitudes and remarks of leaders of various countries often become the focus.

Trump, the controversial President of the United States, has shown a unique perspective on his stance on China. He seems to be one of the most "admired" presidents of the United States, which undoubtedly arouses great interest.

Trump has shown an unusual attitude towards China on many occasions.

For example, he publicly stated that the United States should learn from China.

This stance is different from traditional American politicians in the past.

In the past, the United States often highlighted its own advantages in its diplomatic rhetoric, but did not express much respect for other countries.

This phenomenon also reflects that in Trump’s eyes, China does have something he admires.

His behavior has, to a certain extent, affected the way China and the United States communicate in the field of international public opinion.

Domestically, Trump is under tremendous pressure. He must deal with numerous challenges such as economic fluctuations and employment difficulties.

He observed my country's progress in this field, such as the country's economy continuing to grow under the guidance of government policies and the employment situation remaining stable. These actual achievements may be one of the reasons why he admires our country.

Trump’s remarks about China’s corporate tax rate of 15% have attracted widespread attention.

He made a banner of aligning tax rates with China.

This statement first shows that he wants to optimize the operating conditions of American companies and thereby promote the growth of the American economy.

The current global economic competition is becoming increasingly fierce, and the taxes paid by enterprises have a direct impact on their competitiveness and profitability.

He may hope to encourage more business investment and expansion by lowering corporate taxes.

However, from another perspective, China does have many unique advantages in economic development, and these advantages are not limited to the so-called "15% corporate tax rate".

China has a huge consumer population, a relatively complete industrial chain, and efficient infrastructure construction.

Trump's exaggeration of China's tax rate advantages may be intended to stimulate the American people's urgent need for economic policy reform.

Trump’s accumulation of likes has hit the mark.

In fact, China's corporate tax is 25%, not 15% as he said.

There are also smart people in the United States who have discovered this loophole.

This shows that he is not accurate enough in understanding the situation in China.

This incident exposed the lack of sufficient depth and detail in U.S. decision-making departments when exploring the policies of other countries.

This is related to the style of political decision-making in the United States. Their decisions are often based only on simple and direct data comparisons, lacking a comprehensive and in-depth understanding of the overall situation.

This incident may also cause some minor twists and turns in Sino-US relations.

China believes that although Trump’s gaffe was an isolated incident, it also revealed that the United States needs to be more cautious and scientific in understanding China’s current situation.

Research results from the U.S. Congressional Budget Office show that although the prescribed corporate income tax rate is 39.1%, after reductions and exemptions, the actual tax rate dropped to 18.6%.

This is very different from China's corporate tax.

Data shows that the U.S. corporate tax system contains a large number of tax deductions and exemptions aimed at promoting corporate growth.

Against this background, Trump still focuses on learning from China's low tax policy, which reflects his eagerness to see American companies revive and regain their vitality.

From the perspective of the global corporate tax environment, different countries formulate tax rate policies based on their own national conditions.

The United States' approach of coexisting high legal tax rates with most tax reduction policies and my country's model of directly setting tax rates each have their own advantages and disadvantages.

The American model is more flexible in stimulating companies in specific industries, while the Chinese model is more direct and clear, with higher stability.

Trump’s humility to learn is admirable.

He can observe China's progress and express his desire to learn from China, which is a positive reflection in international exchanges.

Rightly or wrongly, his focus on China reflects China's growing influence.

In his view, even if some aspects are unrealistic, China is still considered superior in some aspects, which is actually an indirect affirmation of China's development path.

This attitude has also brought a new atmosphere to the exchanges between the two countries.

In the past, political exchanges between China and the United States were more transactional.

Trump's expression emphasized the recognition of development and helped promote the two countries to explore more in-depth areas such as cultural exchanges and policy experience exchanges.

After Trump's remarks and the problems behind them emerged, our country also needs to think deeply.

Although the tax burden on our country's enterprises is higher than the actual tax rate in the United States, our country's economic development is even more rapid.

This shows our country’s unique economic vitality, including the hard work of the people and the vast domestic consumer market.

Although global competition is becoming increasingly fierce, our country can still consider adjusting tax policies, especially providing more precise tax incentives to certain emerging industries.

At the same time, in the field of diplomatic public opinion, China must accurately understand the deep meaning of Trump’s special remarks. It is necessary to more effectively present China's image in the field of international public opinion and explain our country's policies. At the same time, we must formulate emergency plans for similar situations that may occur in the future and proactively guide the direction of international public opinion.

Do you think Trump's so-called "admiration" for China will bring good luck or misfortune to the future of Sino-US relations?